Category Archives: Self Defense

Armed Teachers – A Conversation

Really! It is an honest to goodness conversation about teachers being armed. The following is an exchange I had with an old friend of mine. It started elsewhere on social media and I moved my response here. I thought it would be more easily read and understood here.


To lay the ground work, no one that I am aware of is suggesting the compulsory carrying of firearms. The idea is that teachers can volunteer. There are already teachers who carry during the rest of their lives and would like to carry or at least have access to their firearm at work. That is the population we are talking about.

The only unfortunate question we have to ask. Would a gun be used more by a teacher protecting their students or would there actually be more cases of a student getting a hold of the gun, or a crazy teacher losing it and using it on their students, etc. etc.

That’s a great question without a single unfortunate thing about it. I’m glad we’re going to talk about this. Let’s start backwards. You have me on “etc.” as well as “etc.” ;) Next is a crazy teacher losing it and using the gun on the students. Every mass killing I can think of happened after some type of planning. I have not heard of any spontaneous or impromptu spree killings. Forbidding teachers to be armed would not prevent wacko teachers from wacking the students. Too, consider the increasing number of people carrying concealed.

Growing Concealed Carry

In every case where a Shall Issue concealed carry permitting system was introduced opponents claimed there would be “blood in the streets” with people shooting each other over traffic accidents and parking spaces. They claimed it would be a return to the “wild west” (by which they meant a return to Hollywood’s version of the old west which never really existed). What happened? People responsibly armed themselves. Statistically, concealed handgun permit holders are extraordinarily law abiding and I know of zero accounts of permit holders abruptly blowing a gasket and gunning down all in sight.

From this I see that forbidding teachers to be armed will not keep children any safer and allowing them to be armed will not expose them to additional danger.

Students getting the gun. Retention is always a dynamic one considers when carrying. You are considering where to put the gun that will be easy to live with, quick to access, not be seen, and kept there in a way so the gun stays put. While there are many ways of addressing retention for a teacher carrying on-body, the simple solution is off-body “carry” with the firearm in a safe.

[Shall issue means that if you meet a predetermined set of criteria (e.g. not a felon) the issuing agency SHALL/is required to issue a concealed handgun license. As an example you can see Oregon's requirements here: ORS 166.291]

My wife is a teacher, a very good one. She’s grown up around guns as her dad and brother are both hunters, but she, and many teachers we know could never be convinced to carry a gun to school.

I’ll bet she’s great! Like I said, I’m not advocating conscription, just volunteers.

The only logical place to have the gun would be concealed on them so they could access it quickly when needed…and, teachers I know don’t feel that it’s realistic with their jobs of squatting to work with students, sitting with students, playing with students, etc.

I think it is interesting how people without training or experience think they know what is involved in carrying and using a firearm for protection. I wouldn’t dream of telling your wife of what a developmentally appropriate curriculum is for any group of kids.

Actually, as far as defensive situations go, a teacher in a room has a fair amount of time to respond. Take the teacher who lied to the murderer in Connecticut about where the kids were. She knew he was coming and had time to hide all her kids. That would be plenty of time to get a gun out of a safe, especially one like this: Gun Vault

Most folks carrying concealed need to prepare for an ambush of some type. A mass murderer shooting up kids in a school is a frontal assault. I would not spend a lot of time teaching a teacher how to draw fast and efficiently if he or she was just preparing for this scenario.

Additionally, I don’t see the impossibility of on-body carry in the circumstances you describe. There are lots of guns as well as carry options. I’ve had my gun work loose once. That was after crawling around under a house for a couple hours. Without turning this into a primer on concealed carry options I’ll just say those activities are not insuperable barriers to intelligent and responsible on-body carry.

Would you like some examples of guns and holsters that might work?

The Tsunami Dynamic – Knowledge Part 4

April 6th, 2011

First Aid and CPR

You know you should know CPR and first aid already but the Tsunami Dynamic gives you another reason. It is extremely likely that you or someone else you come across will be injured in an emergency.

A great place to start in getting this training is the Red Cross. In addition to this I recommend taking a wilderness first aid course. Stores like REI often host classes like this. If the classes are free go for it but the good classes will cost about $150. Budget extra because you will learn what gear you need and that is the time to get it.

This is not simply a step to take in preparing for a natural disaster. A class like this is an investment in yourself and your family.

Self Defense

Everyone should know a smattering of empty handed combat. Just like you don’t need to be Ray Mears to start a fire, you don’t need to be Bruce Lee to be prepared to defend yourself. For unarmed combat that is quick and dirty I suggest Krav Maga and Systema. Like any skill set you can devote your life to it but what you need is some basics so if you find yourself in a physical conflict you will have some idea about what to do. If you are a female I highly recommend taking a women’s self defense class. Many law enforcement agencies offer them for free. My wife went to Women’s Strength and thought it was a very good investment of her time. When it is free like that you have no excuse.

Weapons. The function of a weapon is to offset differences in physical strength. You should have one. Knives are sometimes better than nothing but to use one you MUST make contact with your enemy. This is where guns are superior. Having a gun guarantees you nothing. You may not be able to deploy a gun before a threat is upon you. But a gun gives you options. Thousands of people use a gun every day to fend off would be attackers and don’t have to shoot anyone. Don’t let this deceive you into thinking that you can just wave a gun at a threat to scare it off. If you draw a firearm you had better be willing to use it.

If you are willing to use a gun then you better know how. You must get training to know how to use a gun to defend yourself. This has nothing to do with plinking or putting holes in paper targets. “Ben, this is way beyond the ‘very reasonable financial outlay’ that you led off with in your introduction.” True. Owning a firearm and getting the training you need is a commitment. However, it is not a huge commitment. Places like PFI can get you squared away on how to effectively use your weapon and there are a lot of good, reliable, and affordable guns to choose from.

I am suggesting that carrying a firearm should be a normal part of your daily life. If it is, then your firearm simply augments your preparations. However, if you are not one who carries on a daily basis then you need to add it to your preps. This would make a firearm a more advanced addition to your “Go Bag.”

The .22 Rimfire for Self Defense

I was listening to Tom Gresham’s GunTalk where he got a call from someone asking about using .22 rimfire guns for self defense. Naturally Tom gave the gentleman the correct information but I wanted to look a little closer at the dynamics of using this round for self defense. But first, why would someone want to use a .22 rimfire? There are several reasons. .22 pistols are often very small and light making them very attractive for concealed carry. The recoil from a .22 pistol is extremely mild. People of small stature and strength find it easier to shoot and in the hands of a skilled shooter the light recoil should make it easier to get rapid and accurate shots off. There are some guns that hold a lot of ammunition like the KelTec PMR-30 (30 rounds!). Finally, many people believe, quite correctly, that the .22 can kill.

Let’s deal with the .22′s lethality first. The .22 has killed. I remember in police academy watching the very sad video of the sheriff deputy who was shot by a dirt-bag maggot with a .22 magnum from a small revolver. I was told that the bullet ricocheted off the deputy’s upper arm bone (humerus) and entered his chest cavity just above his vest where the bullet proceeded to puncture his heart. It was a one in a million shot. I was told that if it had happened on an operating table the surgeons could not have saved him. The reason I relate all this is that while the deputy did die he continued to fight for upwards of 40 seconds. When you are shooting to protect yourself you are not shooting to kill the threat but to stop it. That is not some clever, lawsuit-safe, gutless turn of phrase. That is the way you operate if you want to live. When someone presents a threat you want it stopped NOW not dead later. The .22 does kill but it does not reliably incapacitate quickly.

Working backwards we come to the ammunition capacity. While the KelTec PMR-30 holds 30 rounds most .22 pistols have a capacity in the 10 round range. That is more than say the Ruger LCP with its 6+1 but those .380 rounds are going to do a lot more damage than the 10+ .22 rounds. Even with the PMR-30 that capacity won’t help that much. If you were able to shoot with 0.1 second splits (the time between shots) you would need 3 seconds to make use of all that ammo. And if you need the extra capacity to stop a threat, and you would, that means you will be much slower responding to multiple attackers.

Without question the .22 is an easy gun to shoot but it really doesn’t matter how comfortable it is to shoot if it won’t get the job done and as we’re beginning to see, we can’t count on the .22 to stop the threat. This brings us to a very valid point I’ve heard used in support of the .22 rimfire cartridge, “It’s all about shot placement.” Truer words were never spoken. The only reason a bullet has a positive impact on a threat is by damaging some important part of the threat’s body. I remember one of my instructors chanting, “Fast is fine but accuracy is final.” As Travis Haley pointed out in The Art of the Tactical Carbine this does not mean speed is unimportant but the bottom line is you cannot miss fast enough to stop a threat. Yet when we look at the .22 we find that even when a bullet finds it’s target it does not have a dramatic effect on it. The example of the mortally wounded deputy I cited above illustrates that. Our man there was able to bring the fight to the bad guy for well over half a minute. In a gunfight that is an eternity. And not only is the effect on the target not dramatic when you place your shots well but with the .22 you have fewer targets. The sternum is large and strong enough to deflect a .22, especially if the bullet comes at an oblique angle. The pelvic girdle is simply not a structure in your threat’s body that you will be able to destroy with a .22.

So, ending where the list started, it doesn’t matter how small, light, and easy to conceal your .22 is. The .22 is simply a very poor tool for the job we are forcing it into. However, if I was presented with the choice of going unarmed or legally carrying a .22 I would pack that .22 without a moment’s hesitation. If a threat sees his choice is between leaving me alone or getting shot he may choose to leave me alone. If he doesn’t I’ll remember the limitations of the gun and ammo I’m carrying. Shooting center mass of the body will likely be unproductive. My productive targets are likely to be mostly in the head. I will probably want to aim for the eyes and for up close the ears, the base of the skull, and like George Hill says I can use the .22 in front like “nasal spray.” However, in the end there are so many solid alternatives to the .22 that with a few very specialized exceptions I can’t see the point of using a .22 for a primary weapon.